Ok friends, yesterday we talked about very important topic
of Models. I also told you the importance of Models.
We did the tenses but whatever the things we are able to do
with the help of the tenses, something is left and those
all things we are going to cover with the help of Models.
So, yesterday I cleared this thing for you. Till now
whatever Models we have done, let me remind you a little
bit about what all we have done in Models.
And I think you will be doing the practice.
must, ought to, has, have to, had to, will, shall, plus
have to and additional is to, am to, are to and was to,
were to.
So, I think till now your concept will be clear.
I told you before also that what exactly we need for the
written improvement or maybe communicative improvement in
English.
And in that, very first I cleared for you, Tenses and after
that these all things Models, Prepositions, Connectors.
These we need.
Which is the most important part.
Ok, without these our purpose for spoken or maybe writing
section can't be complete.
So, till now you have seen that.
Here I don't think you should have confusion.
Yesterday I cleared it.
Because what is the confusing part?
Instead of these people also use has, have, to.
And instead of these people use had to.
But I basically cleared you with yesterday's sentence.
That in the sense of sentence there is difference.
In Hindi if we are using different sentence.
So, how can we use in English the same.
If the sentence is of Hindi.
Here, I have to do this.
Yesterday I told you, I am telling you because something is
different.
Second is,
I have to do this.
There are two sentences.
So, In Hindi you see exactly the sentences are not equal.
Something different you are getting the sentence.
I have to do this.
The work has already been done.
It has continuity.
But, I have to do this.
The work has not started yet.
The work is about to start.
We can't make both the same.
In Hindi if the sentence is different.
We are need to translate in English also in different way.
Ok.
The sense of compulsion is common in both.
That work is important in both.
The other person is helpless.
But, One, The work is already going on.
And second,
It will start in future.
It has to be done.
It has not happened.
That's why I told you.
That you have made this.
From has-have.
From above.
From has-have-to.
You have made this.
But, we will make this from this.
Means, this is made from this.
Has-have-to.
I have to do this.
So, I have to
do so.
I have to do this.
So, I am to do so.
Do like this.
So, whatever you say.
Here, we have to clear.
You don't
confuse yourself.
Here, it should be clear.
I am saying this again and again.
Because, outside people do like this.
They make both in same sense.
But, sense is absolutely different.
In Hindi, sense of this sentence is different.
So, why to translate in English in the same way?
You have to give different sense.
Ok.
Similarly, we did here.
Give sentence.
I he there
he he had to go there.
had to go there.
Ok.
In sentence, it is clear that he had to go there.
He had to go there.
Ok. Now, he is not going there.
But, he had to go there.
Secondly,
he had to go there he had to go there.
he had to go there.
What do you think of this sentence?
He had to go there yesterday also.
But, did he go there or not?
He did not go there.
He did not go there. He had to go there.
But, he did not go there.
So, that is the difference.
Here, work was continued.
Here, work was to be done.
But, it did not happen.
You can make the above sentence.
Like, He He had
He had to
He had to go there.
We have made it.
Now, for the below sentence, this sentence I have written,
was to were to, we have to put it.
Because, the work was to be
But, it did not happen.
Work was to be done.
Like, someone invited you on your birthday.
And, you could not go.
And, the next day, he comes and says, you told me to come.
But, you did not come.
So, what did you say?
I had to come.
But, I could not get the time.
I could not manage the time.
I had to go.
I had to come.
But, did you go?
No, you did not.
I had to go.
The sense is clear.
The work was to be done.
But, the work was to be done.
But, it did not happen.
The work did not happen.
So, the sense of both is absolutely different.
So, you are in need to take different slabs.
You have to make it in a different way.
Okay? Now, see, where there are no options, there you
adjust.
You run the work. That's the difference.
The one who does not have an idea, whatever he says, that's
the difference.
But, if you are having an idea, then why don't you choose
the right option? You will choose.
Okay? So, I am talking about the right thing.
The sense is clear.
We will keep it clear.
He was to go there yesterday.
We are talking about the past tense.
Also.
He was to go there yesterday also.
He had to go there yesterday also.
Had to go.
Had to go means, he had to go but did not go.
So, that's why I am giving the sense in a different way.
That the sense is different.
Is it clear? So, you will keep it clear in your mind.
Now, another thing which I want to tell you is very
important.
Number 16.
Used to.
This is a model.
I told you while teaching the tense.
Past tense id Last, the id of indefinite, what is the id of
indefinite, outside people say tatha, tithi, tethi, like
this.
I have taken it very seriously that it is wrong.
Why? Because this is the id of Hindi.
The people who are not in touch with Hindi language, I am
talking about them as well as the people of Hindi.
What is the sense?
Tatha, tithi is giving again, just like this, a sense of
continuity.
But past indefinite represents the single activity.
That is why I told you its id.
a, e, e, dekha, suna, gaya, gaye.
What will be the sentence?
Vahe vaha gaya.
And if we make it with tatha,
Vahe vaha jaata tha.
Jaata tha means what?
Jaya karta tha.
See the difference in both the sentences.
Vahe vaha gaya.
Single, he went there.
Single activity, ek baar kaam hua.
And jaata tha means jaya karta tha.
Means there is a continuity of that activity.
There is a continuity of work.
So work has been happening again and again.
If it is past, then it will be complete.
So if I make it from here in past, and what you are
telling, how will it be made?
It will be made from here.
Used to.
When action is repeated in past, then we will make it from
used to.
For example,
Vahe vaha gaya.
So he went there.
This is based on past tense.
And vahe vaha jaata tha or jaya karta tha.
So what will be?
He used to go there.
Is the difference clear?
Like here I have made the difference clear.
Here I have made it clear.
There also it is the same.
Used to gives the meaning of activity that has happened in
past.
But gives the meaning of continuity of activity.
See, this is communication, written.
What is the motive of this language?
The motive of language is that whatever is going in our
mind, we are in need to express our thinking, our intention
in a proper way.
And if I talk here, vahe gaya or jaya karta tha, we have
the difference.
You know this very well.
You said gaya.
No, jaya karta tha.
Jaya karta tha.
So there is a difference between both.
See, the one who understood these details, he became an
expert.
He got proficiency, command.
And otherwise, everyone else comes to such places.
When I teach, the training classes that we have, we don't
have basic level, that people who study A for Apple and B
for Bat.
So most of the candidates are already trained.
Just they are having some confusion.
We said, polish your language.
We talked about polish.
Improve your confusion.
Correctify your confusion.
For that, you made ten mistakes.
But the single mistakes that started, which you didn't
rectify, are being repeated.
See, no one makes a lot of mistakes.
Everyone can make mistakes.
But no one makes a lot of mistakes.
We just don't improve ourselves and we are just going to
repeat it again and again.
And these are the missing parts, where there is confusion.
I told these three very confusing parts, because outside,
you go to YouTube, you take classes outside, even pick up a
grammar book, you mix these three parts and present it.
I don't know, that they don't do research, or don't
understand their sense, why things are happening like this.
I have been seeing these things for years.
But I am training in this way.
And if you don't find it logical, then you tell me.
It is logical, there is sense difference, and exactly, what
is the motto of the language?
To present your sense, your intention,
and you mixed sense in another place, so how can you
present your intention or sense in a proper way?
So, I think you are understanding the difference.
And this was your next, use to, use.
Use to, use,